The Declaration vs Collectivist Creeds
Discover more from Frederick R. Smith Speaks
The Declaration vs Collectivist Creeds
The Declaration of Independance stand in stark contrast to the collectivist reality of today.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
The opening statement of the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
The Declaration of Independence in part (bold italic text) continues below along with the stark collectivist reality of today (standard typeface):
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. …
Collectivist Creed No. 1: Government shall establish and change rights within its jurisdiction. This authority allows them to enact measures that some individuals might perceive as tyrannical. While this may seem counterintuitive to individual liberties, it is about the collective. Well-being and socialist progress contribute to the collectivist framework.
The Government’s policies seem unjust from particular perspectives. Regardless, we, the collective people, hold these truths to be self-evident. We believe these policies contribute to the common-ist good. We adore the cancellation of conservative and orthodox observers. Oppressive taxes placed on right-wingers ensure the sustainability and accessibility of progressive services and practices. That provides for the advancement of a socialist society as a whole.
Government-funded and protected access to abortion services up to birth is a fundamental right. The unborn are not human. That protects individuals’ autonomy and reproductive rights. The supposed incidents of STDs due to fornication is a fairy tale perpetrated by right-wingers. Perverse activities may conflict with natural and moral beliefs held by some, but too bad. We focus on individual autonomy and the promotion of reproductive healthcare. That results in population reduction providing for the well-being of Mother Earth.
We demand comprehensive grade school sex education, including topics only right-wingers consider pornographic. That is crucial for promoting sexual health, consent, and knowledge among individuals. Education aims to empower individuals to make informed decisions. The teacher unions foster healthy relationships with free condoms to mitigate supposed infections. Support for such education stems from the collective, even if it conflicts with right-wing moral beliefs. We believe in the mystery that promoting well-being within society is possible through debauchery. We foster the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, …
Collectivist Creed No. 2: The Government’s authority and decision-making process should be of the consent of the governed. That means government officers derive their just powers from the consent of the governed collectivists. The broader interests of society overtake individual non-woke beliefs or interests.
In any society, there can be varying influences on government decision-making. That includes the seduction of power and positive external pressures from entities such as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Partners include progressive think tanks, liberal charities, Leninist Churches, Maoist schools, Stalinist academia, and Marxist foundations. In concert with the leftist government, these NGOs constitute the collective power. Resistance is futile. NGOs can shape government policies and agendas. The ultimate goal is to work towards bettering a collectivist society.
NGOs play a significant role. They advocate for social causes and influence policy-making. NGOs can bring specialized expertise, diverse perspectives, and grassroots support. They craft societal issues, providing valuable contributions to the collective decision-making process. It is essential to ensure that government policies reflect the broader interests of a socialist society.
The George Soros-funded NGO (Open Society Foundations) is the prime example of a consummate collective partnership. Through the funding of alt-left district attorneys, it works to decriminalize theft, looting, and even violent crime and murder. That is the flagship program to stamp out systemic racism and inequality.
Government must ensure services such as abortion and sterilization. That is part of a comprehensive healthcare system that further promotes individual autonomy. Reproductive rights provide for the well-being of Mother Earth. Right-wingers have moral or religious objections to these services, but again that is just too bad. A holistic approach places greater emphasis on the needs and rights of the collective. That effort considers public health, gender equality, and individual agency.
Leviathan must balance the interests and needs of the collective. It must take into account the diverse viewpoints and considerations present in society. Influences on government decision-making can vary. But the goal remains to promote the common-ist good, protect individual leftist rights, and enhance socialist well-being.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. …
Collectivist Creed No. 3: Drag shows involving children are an essential collectivist sacramental. That perversion along with safety and happiness creates an inclusive and accepting society. Yet, right-wing domestic terrorists find such shows inappropriate. Remember, the focus is on fostering an environment that respects diverse identities. That ensures all individuals, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation, and minor-attracted persons take part. They can feel valued and supported within society. Heterosexual recognition is a form of hate speech punishable under the full weight of the law.
The provision of chemical/surgical gender reassignment procedures is an essential feature. It affirms the rights and dignity of transgender individuals. By providing gender-affirming healthcare, the Government aims to address unique challenges. Particular emphasis must go to pre-teens faced with transgender issues. The government will provide cost-free support for their physical and mental well-being. This commitment to inclusivity and support for transgender individuals includes equity. It reduces discrimination. Reports of physical and mental issues due to the medical-industrial complex pushing transgenderism is a total fabrication. Thus, those who wish to return to their biological birth right shall be tagged as right-wing patsies. Show no compassion to such persons. They are traitors to the trans community and their cheerleaders.
Individuals who assert their right to pursue happiness outside the collective face consequences. That includes cancellation or social ostracization. The collective well-being and the common-ist good precede right-wing individual desires or beliefs.
Collectivism places importance on shared values and the pursuit of socialist harmony. Personal beliefs guided by orthodox Christian or Jewish principles disrupt the cohesion of liberal society. Comprehensive healthcare must provide unhindered access to a wide range of options. That includes access to anti-life and anti-procreation services. Individual choices in matters of reproductive health must consider the collective.
We must ban access to specific options allowing moral objections based on religious principles. That can hinder the progress and development of society. Individuals must follow collective principles to maintain social order and promote the common-ist good. Thus, principles must align with the broader collective worldview. This is true, even if it conflicts with un-woke personal beliefs.
Classical Christian and Jewish people who object to certain options on moral grounds face the consequences. They are to get listed by the FBI as domestic radical right-wing terrorists. A collectivist society needs social stability and unity. Any dissent or opposition to collectivist policies or beliefs threatens the forever vacation posture.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. …
Collectivist Creed No. 4: The Government shall compel birthers to contribute towards collectivism. All collectivists will get the benefit of abortion, gender reassignment, and freedom from work. The Government is a secular entity that derives its power from the consent of those in office. It is worthy of worship. The principles of collective well-being guide its actions.
To provide new Guards for their future security, Leviathan’s authority enforces contributions towards services like abortion, genital mutilation, and copious never-ending vaccines. Justification occurs through the belief that these services are necessary for the greater good of socialist society. By providing access to such services, the Government ensures health and welfare by reducing the population. That propagates the empowerment and autonomy of collective individuals.
The Government’s authority compels belief in a globalist perspective. That aligns with the objectives of the United Nations (UN) and other entities with similar goals. These entities operate outside the Government but work in harmony with it. They are as valuable allies in advancing collective well-being. Their shared objectives provide harmony. For example, they are promoting reproductive rights and advocating for access to healthcare services. These services also ensure and include genital mutilation and chemical blockers. That contributes to the betterment of society as a whole.
The allure of collective power is a driving force that aligns the interests of the Government. It must exercise its authority to enforce policies and services. These efforts are for the common-ist good, while the UN strives to advance its objectives and bring about positive global social change. This alignment is a means to achieve collective goals. These combined Government and UN efforts can bring about a significant socialist worldwide empire.
Such has been the patient sufferance …; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King … is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
Collectivist Creed No. 5: Cancel objections arising from religious or conscientious beliefs in response to government mandates. Proceed in a manner that prioritizes the well-being of the collective as a whole. The primary concern is to ensure that the Government’s policies and actions align with the collective. That is, collective goals and standards, rather than accommodating individual objections. Right-wing thoughts may disrupt the nation’s functioning or hinder progress. We shall end the history of repeated injuries and usurpations by right-wingers.
Allowing conscientious objections to impede government mandates can compromise the nation’s amoral fabric. From a collectivist viewpoint, the focus is on promoting the common-ist good and advancing the interests of the entire society. Individual un-woke objections should not take precedence over the greater welfare deposits of the nation.
The Government retains the right to change or even abolish the right to conscientious objection. That does not mean suppressing collectivist individual freedoms or beliefs. Thus, we shall moderate how these objections can impede collective progress. The Government can establish new governmental structures, rights, and regulations. Such mandates and laws must align with the common-ist good.
In implementing these changes, the Government should also introduce alternative compliance measures. It must reorganize its authority. That ensures that collectivist individuals who may have objections still have options available. Address collectivists without compromising the effectiveness of government mandates. The introduction of alternative means can promote a more harmonious collectivist relationship.
A collectivist perspective ensures various forms of governance can achieve desired outcomes. Proceed, even if perceived as totalitarian, because that is a necessary element of collectivism. While essential to limit individual liberties, such systems focus on the benefits of socialism. The Government’s role is to make decisions leading to the greatest good. It applies to the most significant number of people, regardless of the specific form of governance.
The Government’s role is to balance the diverse needs and interests of the collective. It must strive to create a fair and equitable society. At the same time, some policies may contradict natural and moral beliefs held by specific individuals. They have no say. The emphasis is on the greater common-ist good and improving society as a whole. This approach acknowledges the advancement of collective welfare. It requires compromises and actions that may be controversial only from a right-wing perspective.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Collectivist Creed No. 6: In a collectivist framework, we have petitioned for redress with an emphasis on the common-ist good. The focus is on the well-being of society as a whole rather than on individual rights and freedoms. Collectivism promotes the idea that individuals should focus on the community’s needs. Collectivist personal desires get protection. We believe that political constraints must maintain socialist order and stability.
The Government may use various instruments to ensure the established system’s protection. That includes conditioning or indoctrination. Through these methods, citizens get taught to accept the status quo. They forgo their rights to overthrow oppressive political constraints. The Government justifies these measures by asserting that they are for the greater good of the collectivist society. It prioritizes the well-being of the collectivist community over individual right-wing autonomy.
Leviathan reaps the rewards of this resistance to non-woke thinking. That occurs regardless of any sustained abuses that may arise over several decades. The subjugation of consciences and religious beliefs is a benefit. It prevents potential ideological divisions or conflicts that could destabilize the collectivist society. The Government maintains order by conditioning citizens via legacy media and academia to comply and accept their circumstances. It demonstrates stability by facilitating the pursuit of the common-ist good.
Collectivists have no ideology but only desire the propagation of a socialist utopia. Thus, only right-wingers have an ideology requiring the full force of the FBI to stamp out. The right-wingers have no rights under the Constitution. Therefore, solitary confinement is a just measure to cancel them.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People … solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States …
Collectivist Creed No. 7: From a collectivist perspective, a noble program exists. It aims to establish a unified global government, economy, and religion. It is known as globalization. The United Nations and other international bodies collaborate to realize this vision. The goal is to create a global governance system. It will cater to all people’s needs except those who provide un-woke arguments against it. Thus, it is necessary to use gaslighting techniques. That will challenge and dismantle xenophobic ideologies. Watch for persistent opposition to the collective agenda. Such individuals face placement on a right-wing terrorist watch. That will maintain social harmony and security.
To promote the ideals of global collectivism, use every available propaganda method. Traditional and classical thoughts are racist. That worldview perpetuates outdated norms and power structures. Classical music, classical works of art, and literature reinforce these discriminatory ideas. Such works belong in the annals of history. It is crucial to magnify the fact that white men authored these works. That highlights the need to recognize the contributions of marginalized groups. Challenge the dominance of a single perspective.
In light of these considerations, censoring renowned figures is good. Trash the works of Shakespeare, Hemingway, and Beethoven. Their literature and music perpetuate exclusionary narratives. Banning books and sheet music becomes valuable when executed by those with a woke understanding of social justice and equality.
We the crummy collectivists solemnly publish and declare implementing these measures can pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable society. We embrace the principles of collectivism and experience euphoric emotions over the cancelation of un-woke thinking people. 📕
Bonus
The Declaration vs Collectivist Creeds
Brilliant concept comparing such totally opposing philosophies.
Well done and concise! Bravo! Just Restacked it.