Family Safety Sanctuaries: A New Dawn for Traditional Values

A Glimpse of Hope: Imagining a Future Rooted in Tradition

Using puberty blockers and undergoing surgeries have consequences. Castration, mastectomies, or hysterectomies can prevent growth and sterilize people. This makes up a hidden-in-plain-sight form of eugenics. Advocates insist these procedures are “safe,” but they remain experimental and unethical. We must watch what happens to the kids and grandkids to determine their safety. But first, gender ideology exposes young kids to harmful procedures. In other words, experimentation of children. This is problematic because there is no clear therapeutic purpose. It aligns with ideas shaped by long-standing messages about birth control and abortion. Despite what the eugenicists say, fertility is not a disorder but a fundamental human good. But we know the Pavlovian environmental mindset cannot comprehend natural goodness. Thus, we see the decoupling of sexuality from procreation to reduce the population.

Frederick R Smith: The “Ethics” of Child Gender Reassignment.

Words 2,305 | Read Time 11 min | Enjoy

Opening Salvo

Wonderful bumper sticker:

Foreword

Huntington Beach Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark is leading a fight for parental rights in response to a new California state law, AB 1955, that allows schools to conceal students’ gender transitions from their parents. On August 6, 2024, Van Der Mark introduced an ordinance to designate Huntington Beach as a “Parents’ Right to Know City,” emphasizing the need for transparency and parental involvement in children’s lives.

Van Der Mark aims to protect parental rights and support those who challenge the law, arguing that the legislation infringes on parents’ constitutional rights to raise their children according to their values. In early September, the City Council of Huntington Beach, California, fought back against the leftist state by voting for the ordinance making the city a “Parents’ Right to Know City,” thus barring schools from keeping parents uninformed about their children’s “sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.”

Despite the challenges, including potential lawsuits from California’s crummy Attorney General, Van Der Mark, a good Democrat, is committed to ensuring Huntington Beach remains a place where parents have a say in their children’s upbringing. The mayor’s efforts reflect a broader concern among parents in the community about the impact of state policies on their families and the importance of maintaining parental authority in education and child-rearing.

Introduction: A Beacon of Hope in Tumultuous Times

In a world torn apart by conflicts and changing cultures, it’s rare to find a spark of hope in a story. Yet recent events in Huntington Beach, California, have managed to inspire just that for me as a writer. Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark’s “Parents’ Right to Know” ordinance sparked interest beyond her Southern California community. A real battle for rights against government secrecy over kids’ gender transitions inspired the story I’m about to share. This tale imagines a future where Huntington Beach’s ordinance spreads nationwide. It leads to the creation of “Family Safety Sanctuaries.” These sanctuaries are havens for families. They want to uphold their values and shield their children from government interference. In these safe spaces, communities thrive. They are self-sufficient and harmonious. They offer a rare, positive glimpse into a troubled, uncertain world.

While the next section of this essay may be fictional, it resonates with the worries and hopes of families nationwide. It envisions a future where values are upheld. Families thrive in nurturing settings. The dream of our forefathers lives on. Enjoy.

A Bright Future: Sanctuary Cities for Parental Rights

In a daring look at a possible bright future, the local initiative in Huntington Beach, California, has become a nationwide movement. It is now the “Family Safety Sanctuaries” program. Inspired by sanctuary cities that sheltered undocumented immigrants, this new wave of sanctuaries protects families. They want to raise their kids free from state-mandated gender pogroms. But this time, the movement took on a new, unexpected twist. It became a haven for undocumented migrant families who share core traditional values.

The movement started in Huntington Beach. Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark introduced a groundbreaking “Parents’ Right to Know” ordinance. This local law informed parents about issues with their children’s gender identity. It pushed back against state laws requiring schools to withhold such information. The idea quickly resonated nationwide. It led to the rapid spread of cogent-based “Family Safety Sanctuaries.”

In these new sanctuaries, local governments passed ordinances. They nullified state laws within their jurisdictions. Schools must provide complete information about a student’s gender identity to their parents. That protects families’ rights to make informed decisions. Local authorities received instructions not to collaborate with state officials on these laws to reinforce the autonomy of the sanctuaries.

As the movement grew, an unexpected alliance emerged. The traditional, undocumented migrant families found a welcome in these sanctuaries. Unlike the modern, promoted dynamics elsewhere, these families valued a strong, united family. This belief strongly aligned with the principles of the Family Safety Sanctuaries. The program helped these communities. They embraced the sanctuaries as safe places to raise their kids, free from government interference. They wanted to instill their natural law values in them. Oh, no hate speech!

Even those called “White Christian Nationalists” by crummy collectivist critics found common ground with this movement. Despite the heated debate on immigration, they backed the program. It aimed to open the borders to undocumented migrant families with high morals. They shared a commitment to traditional family values. A shared belief united this surprising coalition. It was in the old, once-healthy American Dream. It was a vision of family life that mirrored their ancestors’ aspirations.

The impact of the Family Safety Sanctuaries was profound. These zones soon saw a sharp drop in crime. A focus on traditional values and strong families fostered community responsibility and support. New and established families of all faiths, races, and nationalities worked together. They aimed to create safe, nurturing environments for their children. That clear-mined approach led to neighborhoods where crime was a rarity, not a concern. In a positive community that shared cogent-minded beliefs, they thumbed their noses at the progressive mound of crapola. The new cogent affirmation and guiding principles are the love of God, family, and country, in that order. The Stars and Stripes is once again center stage!

Moreover, these sanctuaries quickly became economic engines. The communities embraced much of the Amish way of life. They valued self-sufficiency, craftsmanship, and independence from government intervention. Small businesses thrived as families passed down trades and crafts. Local markets flourished. They sold goods made by skilled artisans. The artisans valued quality over quantity. The focus on community and sustainability created a vibrant, independent local economy. The juvenile notion of cultural appropriation got tossed into the dustbin of history.

As word spread about the success of the Family Safety Sanctuaries, more towns and cities across the nation sought to replicate the model. A response to state legislation had blossomed into a movement. It offered a new path for preserving traditional values in a changing world. These sanctuaries show the power of community and family. They prove the American Dream’s lasting appeal.

Reflection

The above peek into a possible bright future brings us back to the future and the alt-reality of today. Introducing gender identity discussions in public schools has sparked debate. It is a violation of natural law and family integrity. Natural law suggests that rights and morals are inherent and based on biology. It views gender as a fixed trait. From this perspective, teaching fluid or self-defined gender concepts to kids strays from these truths.

Families are the primary educators of values and beliefs. Thus, introducing gender identity in schools is an overreaching fad at best and a Frankenstein-like cult at worst. Parents should guide their children’s moral upbringing. Teaching about gender fluidity without parental consent undermines this role.

Moreover, teaching gender identity early in the child’s development can impose certain beliefs. It presents gender as a choice or spectrum rather than a biological fact. This complexity can confuse young children. It may lead them to question their identity too soon. Early talks on gender can blur the line between truth and belief. That undermines the natural order and family guidance based on personal values.

The remaining cogent-minded people know the entire system is corrupt from the top to the bottom. We have medical “professionals” at the highest level of government advocating this inane ideology, along with teachers working hard to “affirm” children. Houston, we have a problem, a huge pile of crap.

Family Safety Sanctuaries’ story offers hope in today’s complex and overarching contentious world. What began as a local ordinance in Huntington Beach, sparked by Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark’s stand for parental rights, has become a nationwide movement redefining sanctuary in America. These sanctuaries, grounded in traditional values and family unity, have provided a haven for both American families and undocumented migrant families who share a common belief in the importance of the family unit.

As these communities flourished, they fostered social harmony and safety and became beacons of economic independence. By embracing the principles of self-sufficiency, reminiscent of the Amish way of life, these sanctuaries created vibrant local economies that thrived without government intervention. The sharp decline in crime and the rise in community responsibility further underscored the success of this movement.

In a time when many feel disillusioned by the changing cultural landscape, the Family Safety Sanctuaries offer a vision of what could be—a return to the core values that once defined the American Dream. This fictional story, inspired by real events in Huntington Beach, serves as a reminder that even in dark times, there is always the potential for a brighter future, rooted in tradition and strengthened by family bonds.

In summary, many know that the introduction of gender identity talks in schools is a challenge to natural law and family integrity. It raises concerns about schools overstepping their boundaries. It is crucial to reconsider the timing and manner of these discussions to protect parental rights and respect beliefs. That ensures families remain central to a child’s moral development.

Conclusion

The Huntingdon Beach Family Safety Sanctuary illustrates a backlash against putrid progressive ideologies. The pure, unadulterated evil of affirmation is intent on eroding our traditional values and community bonds. Progressivism claims to be the champion of inclusivity and modernity. In reality, it tramples on the rights and values that many Americans hold dear.

The fictional sanctuaries, emphasizing parental rights and family values, give us hope for future success. They remind us that not everyone is eager to embrace the latest progressive trends. If the progressive agenda ignores those who value tradition, it will alienate many. The Family Safety Sanctuaries would not just be a simple refuge. They rebuke the one-size-fits-all approach that fails to match America’s truly diverse values.

In our quest for progress, we must not erase our past. True advancement is about honoring the good, learning from mistakes, and moving forward. It’s time to reevaluate our balance between innovation and tradition. The rise of these sanctuaries could shake up the current narrative and challenge the progressive status quo.

Parting Shot

The crummy champions of immigrant sanctuary cities, who proudly tout their mushy moral high ground in resisting federal immigration laws, would likely be the first to decry the idea of “family sanctuary cities” that protect parental rights against state mandates. These puss-ozing progressive voices insist that local jurisdictions have the moral authority and civic duty to defy federal immigration enforcement. These wide-skull intellectual giants with pea brains argue it’s all about protecting vulnerable communities, maintaining public trust, and preserving local “values.” Yet, when it comes to the idea of family sanctuary cities—where parents could refuse to follow state directives on education, healthcare, or child-rearing—their tasteless tune suddenly changes. The very principles of autonomy, resistance, and protection of community values that they champion so fervently for undocumented immigrants get swiftly discarded.

Instead, rest assured, they’ll paint these family sanctuaries as reckless and dangerous, accusing them of jeopardizing children’s welfare or undermining public policy. It will be everything from “White Christian Nationalism” to xenophobia and everything else in between. In their projecting eyes, defying federal immigration laws is a noble act of civil disobedience, a righteous stand against oppressive laws. But when parents seek to make independent choices about their children, the same puffy progressives are quick to have mental breakdowns. These projectors of crummy collectivism will label cogent-minded parents as right-wing extremists, selfishly disregarding the crummy collective good. The hypocrisy is glaring: it’s perfectly acceptable to ignore federal mandates if they align with their raunchy-rancid worldview. But, a big butt, when it comes to parents resisting state overreach, suddenly, it is an insult to their dippy dystopian societal order.

Ultimately, the message is as clear as a cracked glass eyeball. Resistance and autonomy are only virtues when they serve the perverted progressive ideological agenda. For all their talk of tolerance and freedom, the moment autonomy and cogent thoughts clash with progressive amoral ideals, it becomes not an act of courage but a threat to stamp out. The purified prevented progressive Pavlovian puppets with pea brains can go pound sand.

The putrid progressives hate each of us and our cogent thoughts. Nevertheless, as commanded, we must love the individuals projecting this putrid crapola as our neighbors. But, it is time to samp out and stomp on the evil. The time is now or never to burn a particularly rancid book: the Cultural Marxist Affirmation Perverted Portfolio of Putrid Plans. Get the blow torch to start the grill!

Anti-Woke Closing

Play it often; play it loud. Irriate the Willfully Overlooking Known Evil (WOKE) ecosystem. 📕

---

Tips appreciated!

I warmly encourage you to consider becoming a paid subscriber if you have the means. Tips are appreciated, too. Regardless of your choice, your support is deeply appreciated. From the bottom of my heart, thank you for your invaluable support!