The "Ethics" of Child Gender Reassignment

Despite juvenile-like repetitive stroking motions of nefarious influencers, gender/sex reassignment of children is a cancerous, uber-sick grand experiment. The ethics of it all? Zero.

Oct 07, 2023

Gender dysphoria—formerly known as “gender identity disorder”—is characterized by a severe and persistent discomfort in one’s biological sex. It typically begins in early childhood—ages two to four—though it may grow more severe in adolescence. But in most cases—nearly 70 percent—childhood gender dysphoria resolves. Historically, it afflicted a tiny sliver of the population (roughly .01 percent) and almost exclusively boys. Before 2012, in fact, there was no scientific literature on girls ages eleven to twenty-one ever having developed gender dysphoria at all.
Shrier, Abigail (Irreversible Damage)

Executive Summary

Introduction: The United States has a low fertility rate of 1.64, below the replacement rate of 2.1. American families with children have been decreasing since the 1980s. Currently, only 40 percent of families have kids. This trend has led to children becoming less common within American society. Furthermore, people worry about encouraging children to believe they were born with the wrong gender and to become sterile.

Transformation: Some people criticize the safety of puberty blockers and gender-transformation surgeries. They worry about the possible effects on fertility and other physical outcomes. This is part of discussions about fertility, gender beliefs, and population management. Influencers use language tricks and false numbers. Parents aren’t consulted about decisions for children’s bodies.

Analysis: The idea of parenthood is changing because of the “social justice” movement. Official documents now use “parent one” and “parent two” instead of motherhood and fatherhood. How we help people have babies can change how kids view their families. It also makes us question what a “normal” family is. People are very concerned about how it will affect mental health.

Conclusion: The surge in unusual gender manipulation, seen as a form of population control, often goes unnoticed in an alternative reality realm. The complicated process helps the privileged. It changes cells and requires many surgeries. In a limited healthcare system, there are concerns about prioritizing gender transformation. We must recognize the moral issues with these practices and stress the importance of discussing them.

Introduction

A society’s viability relies on maintaining a replacement rate of 2.1. Currently, the United States faces a low fertility rate of 1.64, with the contribution of U.S. Hispanic women at 1.94 being a notable exception. Since the 1980s, the National Marriage Project has observed a decrease in American families with children. Currently, only 40 percent of families have kids. This shift makes children foreign entities within the post-modern Marxist-leaning “mainstream” of American society.

We have planned chaos, invading groups, and a unified force called Borg Collective. This is a high-octane additive to the fertility cremation fire. The New World Order Pavlovian puppets use a nonexistent southern border to fill the void left by the unnatural abortion process, and more as we shall see. It is all about saving Mother Gaia through the murder of the unborn and the deliberate trashing of traditional families. Thus, the dopey Democrats garner Marxist votes, and the rejected Republicans get cheap labor. Do we even see the hypocrisy of this satanic program to fill the void of missing children with illegal immigrants?

You saw it first here. The Third Amendment of the Constitution forbids the government from quartering troops in your home. What defense will we have when they force us to break bread with the invaders in our house? Think about that, particularly for those living in “low-income” housing or apartments. The grand plan, we will own nothing. Enjoy the fellowship of the invaders in the hotel room next to yours as you travel for work or vacation. We already pay for the well-being of the invaders with our tax dollars and hidden tax called inflation. Democrats hate babies but love invaders. Republicans are useless with the few good ones facing the Marxist projection of “MAGA.” Advocating for MACA (Make America Communist Altogether) opposes promoting American greatness.

Even more alarming is the current caustic promotion of sterility among our dwindling children. This very dangerous ideology supports transforming the bodies of young people. Nefarious influencers compel them to think they were born with the wrong gender. Elements of influencing include legacy media, social media, and teachers. Even the government works to neuter children as they “have their back.”

Of course, the nefarious influencers never discuss the salient details in lockstep with the Marxist ecosystem. To inquire about these spicey details will get you thrown out of the room and under the bus.

Transformation

Using puberty blockers and undergoing surgeries have consequences. Castration, mastectomies, or hysterectomies can prevent growth and sterilize people. This makes up a hidden-in-plain-sight form of eugenics. Advocates insist these procedures are “safe,” but they remain experimental and unethical. We must watch what happens to the kids and grandkids to determine their safety. But first, gender ideology exposes young kids to harmful procedures. In other words, experimentation of children. This is problematic because there is no clear therapeutic purpose. This aligns with ideas shaped by long-standing messages about birth control and abortion. Despite what the eugenicists say, fertility is not a disorder but a fundamental human good. But we know the Pavlovian environmental mindset cannot comprehend natural goodness. Thus, we see the decoupling of sexuality from procreation to reduce the population.

Regardless of the above facts, the nefarious influencers will attack those who note the efficacy of heterosexuality. Despite the apparent biological safety of monogamous heterosexuality, they will use Marxist linguistic gymnastics to make their case. Further, using alchemy-like procedures, the gender bender pushers gin up fat-fake “statistics.” Using these figures, they claim a lack of what they call “affirming care” results in mental disorders. It is a form of projection.1

Meanwhile, at the beginning of the school year, parents must complete a packet of documents for their school-age children. The school nurse can administer a specific medication to the child in a detailed record. Parents must consent, as their child lacks the legal capacity to do so. Yet parents are usually not told about these dehumanizing gender decisions because they assume the child can decide independently. Insanity.

We have reached a cultural turning point. In the past, only adults chose castration or sterilization, but now, it’s seen as a social mandate for minors. “Public health officials” and educators steer minors down these paths unfettered. Without parents knowing, they act as accomplices with legal immunity, which is even scarier. Dare to express concern at a school board meeting and face the possibility of placement on an FBI terrorist watch list.

Until a few years ago, medical ethics upheld strict boundaries. It prevented minors from consenting to medical or surgical interventions without parental authority. Medical professionals are now changing minors’ bodies, preventing them from becoming parents. They do this in the name of “therapy,” based on their claims about their “gender identity.” But first, nefarious influencers take advantage of the malleable mental state of youngsters. In this ecosystem, they manipulate the minds of youngsters to believe Mother Nature got it all wrong.

The medical-pharmaceutical industry sucking on the teat of this pork belly constitutes a scandal biblical in stature.2 Meanwile, the American “Medical” Association (AMA) manufactures an additive to the gender-tamping fuel. That is, AMA doctors experts recommend removing sex designation from birth certificates. This quintessential example aligns with the age-old quip that money is the root of evil.

This rapid change in society raises important moral questions. Children can now choose not to have children via castration permanently and prematurely. Then, they get to see what remains of the natural goodness as they grow up and gain life experiences. But it will be too late as “reverse therapy” is forbidden for youngsters not yet mutilated by the new Frankenstein’s doctor. To think that future medical advances will undo castration is a foolish thought. Even if true, that does nothing but propagate suffering. Influencers, who are, in reality, doing bad things, try to make children change their bodies before they grow up. The caustic creeps causing suffering are not those who want to preserve male and female beauty. They destroy it.

When parents let their kids do these procedures, they’re saying children are the better parents. That is the underlying legacy few will even dare to address. Calling someone a “bigot” for expressing this vital concern is one of many tactics used by people with heterophobic tendencies. I have experienced this verbal abuse. This includes heterosexual people who march goose-step in line to participate in the Gastly Gaslighting of the children. They constitute the cadre of Pavlovian neo-heterosexuals.

Today, some individuals seem to have a cult-like desire to engage in morally questionable activities, as described in the essay. Some remain oblivious to these actions, while others stay silent, fearing potential repercussions for speaking out. Numerous instances of this societal complacency have emerged throughout history, often leading to severe and far-reaching consequences.

The “harassment” quip in the above graphic illustrates a stark reality. In October 2023, the Biden administration proposed a guideline on harassment in the workplace that includes “misgendering” employees under the legal umbrella of sex-based harassment. The move would change current legal definitions of sex-based harassment to include comments about “reproductive decisions… about contraception and abortion” as well as “sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Analysis

The “social justice” contagion changed our view of being parents. That affects the connection between marriage and having children. Today, the traditional idea of parenthood is changing. Instead of “mother” and “father,” official documents now use “parent one” and “parent two.” This redefinition carries significant implications for “new age” children. This poses complex questions for those born from sperm donors or through in-vitro fertilization. The natural family identity has become a fantasy. According to the dogmatic secular spirit, we must adhere to the modern family, a unit of the nanny state, like it or not.

The challenges posed by these developments far exceed our legal and cultural frameworks. We must pay attention to this critical discussion. How we have children affects society. Even if people say “all families are equal,” rejecting biology will still end families. Nowadays, most people become grandmothers or grandfathers based on biology instead of Marxist social constructs. Beware, that common sense bulwark of society faces a cancer-like metamorphosis. We are at the rubicon of a dystopian reality like Logan’s Run or Children of Men.

Companies like Apple, Google, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart now offer ova freezing as a work perk. They focus on financial progress above everything else. Every year, people observe World Vasectomy Day on the third Friday of November. It honors men who choose sterilization to prevent “unwanted pregnancies.” Further, the unborn are relegated to the same status as enslaved people, considered not human. This reflects a dogmatic secular imperative in the post-Roe era.

More recently, a study in Britain found that 33% of young people who took puberty blockers had worse mental health. In June 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that the United States disagrees more with Western nations.3 The Biden administration supports radical “transgender” policies and practices for children! It reinforces unnatural and unsafe gender reassignment but causes more suffering for those involved. But of course, it is all for the common-ist good.

A society that decouples sexual activity from procreation jettisons the healthy and safe practice of abstinence for those not of age. Thus, with unlimited contraception, abortion, and gender/sex reassignment, the act is nothing more than a drug-like addiction absent its inherent good. Think about the inability of those transformed to have healthy adult married sexual pleasures linked to procreation. While not the stated goal, this social contagion facilitates children into unnatural sex activities. For example, the New Jersey Department of Education “Comprehensive Health and Physical Education” curriculum requires eighth-grade students to have an “understanding” of anal and oral sexual activity (page 34):

There are factors that contribute to making healthy decisions about sex. .. 2.1.8.SSH.9: Define vaginal, oral, and anal sex.

In the past, the two unnatural activities mentioned above were only seen in adult movie theatres and performed in houses of ill repute. In my day, only normative sexual activity was taught as part of biology class in high school. Back then, people exposing young children to these activities, as well as normative intercourse, would face abuse charges. Today, like in Nude Jeresy, we teach children about (all) these activities in public grade school settings. In many school districts, parents are prohibited from opting out of these disgusting pornography-like indoctrination sessions. Perverts and their Pavlovian lap dogs have taken over the school systems.

In the future, it might be hard for people to want to “find their families” because of the dystopian ways of procreation. We must safeguard our children from state-sanctioned genital alteration/removal and secure their future as potential parents. This situation echoes the dystopian vision depicted by George Orwell in his novel 1984. To call this nefarious program “gender affirmation” is a form of gaslighting on steroids.

It is disconcerting to observe an exponential allocation of medical resources towards this program aimed at addressing artificially manufactured sexual confusion. In this grand experiment, those advocating for “choice” ironically become anti-choice in assisting the unfortunate victims of this challenging journey to reclaim their innate identity.

The support of gender reassignment forms a blight on society. That can lead to sterilization instead of using birth control. Birth control is also the wrong program for children who keep their natural reproductive organs. The safe and healthy path is abstinence practiced until adulthood. Discussions about abstinence are often ignored and seen as “controversial.” Scorn occurs regardless of the sound and safe reality of this approach. Even outside the religious aspect, this is a truly biologically efficacious methodology. Nevertheless, as an ace in the hole, the sexuality-confusion throat-shoving luminaries relegate it to a breach in their Worshiped Wall of Separation.

But wait, there is more. In October 2023, Eventbrite’s ticketing platform removed an event featuring detransitioner Chloe Cole from its platform. Eventbrite claimed the event warning of the dangers of subjecting children to “transgender” treatments violates a policy against “hateful, violent, and dangerous events.” Very ethical.

Conclusion

The surge in the unnatural transformation of gender/sex in the alternative reality realm serves as a mechanism for population reduction. That is a fact that often escapes notice. This complex endeavor is orchestrated as a medical and psychological operation, primarily benefiting the most privileged members of society. Those seeking “gender affirmation” undergo the harrowing ordeal of altering their cellular composition and undergoing extensive and necessary bodily surgeries. In a healthcare landscape where resources are scarce for the majority, reproductive organ mutilation “care” takes precedence. It is a perplexing prioritization only explained under the rubrics of the most caustic psychological operation ever launched on society.

This caustic brew makes the entire government-medical-pharmaceutical complex (the un-trust) guilty of junk science and eugenics at worst. The drug pusher-like penchant for mutilating reproductive organs of CHILDREN makes it impossible for cogent-thinking people to “trust the science.” Any assemblage of ethics and trust has evaporated into the dustbin of history. Therefore, with the un-trust’s throat shoving of their big lie called “gender affirmation”(mental abuse and muliation), it is impossible for cogent-thinking people to go along with this charade. This alone makes it a non-starter to accept gene-altering injections as a safe and effective way to “prevent” COVID-19. Few realize they are gunnie pigs of an experiment. Again, welcome to the New Word Order.

Today, some individuals willingly engage in morally questionable influencing activities, as described in the essay. Some remain oblivious to these actions, while others stay silent, fearing potential repercussions for speaking out. Numerous instances of this societal complacency have emerged throughout history, often leading to severe and far-reaching consequences.

Beware, the Socialist Propagandists Liars & Crooks (SPLC), on behalf of the FBI, work to place works like this essay into the list of banned writings. Remember, left-wingers only do book bans to cancel the natural good. They also get to exercise their nefarious linguist prowess. That creepy organization works to make authors who discuss the natural good out to be potential right-wing domestic terrorists. It is all nothing more than putrid projection.

Despite SPLC’s and the rest of the left wing's juvenile-like repetitive stroking motion noises, the truth prevails. Gender/sex reassignment of children is a cancerous, uber-sick grand experiment. The ethics of it all? None.📕

The "Ethics" of Child Gender Reassignment

Despite juvenile-like repetitive stroking motions of nefarious influencers, gender/sex reassignment of children is a cancerous, uber-sick grand experiment. The ethics of it all? Zero.

Executive Summary

Introduction

Transformation

Analysis

Conclusion

Recommended Topical Resources

Frederick R. Smith Speaks

Podcasts

Discussion about this post