Too white? Too male? Too straight? Too bad - Guest Post by Bill McCusker
Too white? Too male? Too straight? Too bad - Guest Post by Bill McCusker
Bill McCusker defends the authors and artists whose work helped build civilization
It is an honor to present this guest post by my friend William McCusker, a contributor to World Net Daily (WND). This essay first appeared in WND and with Bill’s encouragement and permission, enjoy it here at Frederick R. Smith Speakes.
Too white? Too male? Too straight? Too bad
When school boards, teachers and librarians cancel “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Huckleberry Finn,” yet soil themselves over others removing a book from grade school libraries just because it shows young boys fellating each other – it might be time for some rational reflection.
In recent years, I have had the opportunity to read Homer’s “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey,” Euripides’ plays, Turgenev’s “Fathers and Sons,” Hugo’s “Les Misérables,” Greene’s “The Power and the Glory” and other literary gems. I have listened to the remarkable Renaissance compositions of Palestrina and most of Mozart’s symphonies and concertos. I dusted off a few volumes of my old Time-Life art series and was again astounded by the paintings, sculptures and architectural wonders of Michelangelo, Raphael, Leonardo and other Italian Masters. I marveled once more at the works of Monet, Renoir, Manet, Sisley, Pizarro, Gauguin and other French impressionists.
How does one describe this small sample of artistic achievement? Genius? Extraordinary insight into the human condition? Remarkable beauty? Divine inspiration?
Sadly, these masterpieces are increasingly condemned for being the hateful, sexist, racist, homophobic, colonialist, Eurocentric, transphobic, etc. products of dead white men – deserving not praise but scorn, not study but cancellation.
In a recent video, a public school teacher belched self-praise for striking Homer from the literature syllabus. At the University of Pennsylvania, an image of Shakespeare in the English department was replaced with that of a black lesbian poet. Not to be outdone, high schools and colleges nationwide have tossed Shakespeare aside. Dickens, Joyce, Balzac, Flaubert, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Cervantes, Dante and Goethe don’t stand a chance.
Hollywood has declared that any movie to be considered for the Best Picture Academy Award must now include the requisite numbers of underrepresented people in its production. Actor Richard Dreyfuss said that such a paint-by-numbers scheme imposed on art makes him “want to vomit.” He said artists should not be forced to pander to any group. Refreshing, perhaps, but on how small of an island does Dreyfuss stand?
Looking ahead, will producers, publishers and curators next say “no thanks” to works of art falling short of de rigueur diversity quotas? They already are; see Disney. Looking back, will existing books, scripts and images be altered to comply with preferred racial, gender and gender identity standards? That, too, proceeds apace.
(Hmm … speaking of remaking the past, one wonders what the Philadelphia Flyers did with the Kate Smith statue. An icon one moment, gone the next. Her crime? Singing “God Bless America,” way back when the Flyers were Stanley Cup contenders, about the time Ben Franklin was flying his kite. And she wasn’t even a white guy).
What’s next? Remaking “The Godfather” so that Michael and Fredo are gay? Making the “Mona Lisa” Asian? Retouching a few apostles in da Vinci’s “The Last Supper” so that drag queens have a seat at the table? Giving a little top surgery to a bather or two of Rubens? Using a chisel to turn Michelangelo’s David into a birthing person? It’s becoming very hard to exaggerate.
Imagine shunning a miracle cure because it was invented by a straight white male. Similarly, imagine throwing onto some 21st-century trash heap the priceless legacy of a civilization’s masterworks because they were created by artists belonging to a race, gender, or sexual preference now out of favor.
Instead of canceling them, our new-age philistines should bow down in awe to these masters in appreciation and celebration of the extraordinary gifts they have given to the world’s generations following them.
Too white? Too male? Too straight?
Too frickin’ bad.
Bill McCusker is an author, speaker, and retired business leader. He lives in New Jersey.
The only "art" that gender identitarians produce is pornography. Everything else they make is an act of cultural vandalism.
My friend is a talented lady, she made this quilt, https://scontent.fjbr1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/345628792_918967335998671_2397811043935856033_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=ozhTqSkRu08AX9-svIe&_nc_ht=scontent.fjbr1-1.fna&oh=00_AfCvDmeX3Rgm-3naSeOeI4MlPkH2XMZ1Kw9rstK15fQvYw&oe=64643742
I embroidered the same sampler and put it in a photo frame.
Your Michangelo's Pieata was an excellent choice for this article. Michelangelo claimed that the block of Carrara marble he used to work on this was the most “perfect” block he ever used, and he would go on to polish and refine this work more than any other statue he created. http://www.italianrenaissance.org/michelangelos-pieta/
The Woke had to go and ruin our Mother's/Father's day,
Woke Corporations Pushing to Cancel Mother's Day Notifications, May Be 'Sensitive'
BOYCOTT KAY'S IS 1 OF THE BIGGEST ADS FOR EXPENSIVE JEWELRY.
According to a Twitter thread by Arizona Informer, at the end of April, companies such as DoorDash, Kay’s Jewelers, Fry’s Food Stores and Levi’s allowed their patrons to avoid promotional material about Mother’s Day because the leftist companies felt that the holiday and the concept of motherhood may be too “sensitive” for some people.
Some people, however, praised the woke companies for their decision because the holiday may indeed be difficult for some people.
https://headlineusa.com/woke-corporations-pushing-to-cancel-mothers-day-notifications-may-be-sensitive/?utm_source=HUSAemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HUSAemail