The Hegelian Dialectic: Unmasking Political Manipulation and Elite Control
Exploring the Influence of the Power Elite, Hegelian Dynamics, and Economic Tyranny in American and German Politics
Hence, so far as Spirit is necessarily this immanent differentiatitm, its intuited whole appears’ over against its simple self-consciousness, and since, then, the former is what is differentiated, it is differentiated into its intuited pure Notion, into Time and into the content or into the in-itself. Substance is charged, as Subject, with the at first only inward necessity of setting forth within itself what it is in itself, of exhibiting itself as Spirit. Only when the objective presentation is complete is it at the same time the reflection of substance or the process in which substance becomes Self. Consequently, until Spirit has completed itself in itself, until it has completed itself as world Spirit, it cannot reach its consummation as self-conscious Spirit. Therefore, the content of religion proclaims earlier in time than does Science, what Spirit is, but only Science is its true knowledge of itself.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ~ The Phenomenology of Spirit
Words 3,086 | Read Time 14 min | Enjoy
Introductory Summary
In the annals of Western philosophy, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel stands as a towering figure, shaping discourse from the late 18th to early 19th centuries. His pioneering concept of dialectical thinking reverberates across metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy, illuminating the intricacies of human cognition and societal evolution.
At the heart of Hegel’s philosophy lies the dialectical method, a lens through which he perceives reality as a tapestry woven with contradictions awaiting resolution. From this dialectical crucible emerges progressive “progress,” as opposing forces converge towards synthesis, heralding new paradigms and insights. Hegel’s magnum opus, The Phenomenology of Spirit, charts the odyssey of human consciousness through dialectical stages. At the same time, The Philosophy of History propounds his vision of a World Spirit that guides the arc of historical development. His profound and profound ideas have indelibly shaped subsequent philosophical discourse, influencing luminaries like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
Yet, Hegel’s intellectual legacy transcends academia, permeating the corridors of power and political intrigue. In Germany, his dialectical framework found fertile soil, steering the nation towards what Hegel termed “rational tyranny” - rejecting individual rights in favor of the state as “absolute reason.” Across the Atlantic, the influence of Hegel’s ideas intersects with the machinations of the power elite - an intellectual cadre wielding the concept of absolute reason to orchestrate societal transformation. Their manipulation, cloaked in Hegelian dialectics, blurs the lines between capitalist and communist ideologies, ensnaring figures like Marx and Hitler in their ideological web.
The nexus of power and politics finds its embodiment in figures like W. Averell Harriman and George H. W. Bush, whose actions epitomize the application of Hegelian dialectics in shaping policy and public discourse. From Yale’s hallowed halls to the Oval Office, Bill Clinton navigated the Hegelian labyrinth, positioning himself as a linchpin in the dialectical dance of political centrism.
As the specter of economic tyranny looms, Hegel’s dialectical prism illuminates the mechanisms of oppression - from government debt creation to monetary inflation. The Federal Reserve, conceived as Marx’s Trojan Horse, becomes a tool of subjugation, ensnaring Americans in a web of debt and dependence. Despite the clarion calls of dissent, the march towards subservience continues unabated. Hegel’s legacy, intertwined with the machinations of the power elite, casts a shadow over the American experiment, fostering a culture of acquiescence and dependency.
In the crucible of Hegelian dialectics, the fate of nations hangs in the balance - a synthesis of power and control veiled beneath the guise of reason and democracy.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was a German philosopher. He is one of the most influential figures in Western philosophy, particularly known for his development of the concept of dialectical thinking. Hegel’s work spans metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and political philosophy.
At the core of Hegel’s philosophy is the dialectical method, which he applied to understanding the development of ideas, history, and reality. According to Hegel, reality is contradiction and change, and “progress” occurs through resolving these contradictions.
Hegel’s most famous work is The Phenomenology of Spirit, where he explores the development of consciousness and self-awareness through a series of dialectical stages. He also wrote extensively on the philosophy of history in works such as The Philosophy of History, where he presents his idea of the “World Spirit” guiding the unfolding of history towards an ultimate goal. Hegel’s ideas have profoundly impacted subsequent philosophical thought, influencing thinkers such as Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895). While his work is complex and often challenging, Hegel remains a central figure in the history of philosophy, renowned for his innovative approach to understanding the world.
Exploring the Influence of the Power Elite
Contrary to the United States, Germany’s political ideology, before and after World War II, rejected the importance of individual rights. Instead, Germany followed the Hegelian dialectical process towards what can be termed “rational tyranny.” According to Hegel, personal liberties were not valued, with the state assuming a divine-like status, where citizens’ duty served the state as an embodiment of absolute reason. The necessity for secrecy surrounding these ideas in the United States becomes evident.
The influence of the power elite, a group of intellectuals who perceive themselves as having transcended conventional religion, is a fascinating aspect of political dynamics. They exploit the concept of absolute reason to influence society across the political spectrum. This elite encompasses individuals from both capitalist and communist ideologies, with historical figures like Marx and Hitler tracing their philosophical origins to Hegel. Prominent members of this elite include figures such as W. Averell Harriman (1891-1986), who supported communism, and George H. W. Bush (1924-2018), who represented capitalist neo-conservatism. Their manipulation tactics exemplify the application of Hegelian dialectics, a hidden aspect of political power that is intriguing to explore.
As a Yale alumnus and president, Bill Clinton was a key player in the Hegelian dialectical process, positioning himself in the middle of the political spectrum. He took a firm stance on the left on issues like affirmative action. In contrast, his “adversary,” the undisputed Bonesman, CLA-affiliated William F. Buckley (1925-2008), publisher of the National Review, practiced decrying “reverse discrimination” from the right.
When it comes to drug policy, a role reversal occurs, revealing the manipulation tactics of the power elite. Buckley, a member of this elite, advocated for liberal drug policies, aiming to desensitize the masses, while Clinton projected a tough anti-drug stance as Commander in Chief [see Parting Shot below]. That is just one example of how influential elites steer major policy decisions. As “managed conflict” in covert circles, the Hegelian process involves deliberately sowing division among populations, manipulating opposing factions, and resolving conflicts favoring a select few puppeteers—entities like the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. Hegel’s teachings suggest that this Machiavellian strategy maintains control and fosters the illusion of public influence, a concerning aspect of political power dynamics.
A Parliament or Congress serves as a fiat validation of dumbocracy hidden in plain sight as a participatory democracy. However, in the United States, most candidates for the federal legislature are chosen based on a similar principle of opposition, with their candidacies funded by the financial backing of the power elite. This arrangement creates the illusion of public choice, allowing citizens to “vote” for one candidate at the polls. Yet, if current trends persist, the need for public confirmation may soon become obsolete. Instead, the power elite could announce the chosen leaders directly.
The Hegelian method of instigating change through conflict between opposing forces follows a three-stage process: thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. In the initial thesis stage, the proposed idea or desired change must evolve into a predicament, often referred to as a problem, to set the stage for subsequent process stages.
The emergence of a proposal through the media, in the form of a legislative proposal, a “white paper,” etc., will trigger an opposing force or antithesis. This second stage guarantees that both sides in a polarized public will fear the loss of statist privilege or entitlement.
Amidst such turmoil, panic and hysteria often erupt, sometimes escalating to violence. Recent events like the George Floyd protests, characterized as “mostly peaceful but fiery,” and the January 6th incident serve as examples. Additionally, perennial tensions between racial groups, notably Black and White communities, provide fertile ground for manipulation by provocateurs adept at stoking fear and panic. The power elite emerges victorious. Rather than achieving a resolution between opposing forces, the outcome reflects a synthesis—a melding of conflicting elements. In this third stage of the Hegelian dialectical process, the power elite offers a solution to the predicament it initially created. With the populace conditioned through the antithesis stage, the predetermined outcome can now be the people’s “choice.” This synthesis becomes the new thesis, initiating a renewed cycle within the Hegelian framework.
Within the framework of Hegelian politics, only the power elite possess the authority to enforce decisions. This Hegelian construct perpetuates the notion of the state as an omnipotent entity, with citizens compelled by a perceived religious duty to serve it. For more, see my essay Nasty Nanny State Nanny Care. Economic manipulation, exemplified by the practices detailed in my essay The Creature from Jekyll Island, serves as a potent tool for enslaving populations and fostering dependence on governmental support for survival. While taxation historically served as the despot’s primary instrument of confiscation, in contemporary times, subtler methods occur in ostensibly “democratic” societies like the United States. Enterprising power elite members, such as cunning bankers, have devised strategies such as government debt creation and monetary inflation to exploit the populace further.
Thomas Jefferson had a firm insider understanding of the conspiratorial politics of this world and the people in it who preferred money and power to God’s divine plan. He warned future generations of Americans that the power elite concept of a free lunch paid for by debt leads to war and more taxes, both profiting the money cabal:
And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes; have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers.1
Despite warnings, Americans failed to heed the alarm. Following the establishment of the Federal Reserve (1913), which served as Karl Marx’s Trojan Horse, the government embarked on a relentless accumulation of debt in the “people’s interest.” This debt escalation staggered from $16 million in 1930 to $269 million by 1946. Fast forward to the turn of this century, and the figure had soared to $7 trillion. The debt has ballooned to an unprecedented $31 trillion and continues to climb. Right now, each American gets saddled with approximately $93,000 worth of IOUs, with a significant fraction of their earnings dedicated to servicing the interest.2 Compounded by interest payable to central bankers, retiring this national debt is impossible. Instead, it perpetuates itself, exacerbating inflationary pressures on the monetary supply.
Through covert means, the collective set of governments now seizes over half of United States citizens’ income, with indications pointing towards complete absorption. This relentless fiscal encroachment necessitates American families to rely on dual incomes for survival, starkly contrasting to the previous single-job sufficiency. Inflation, functioning as a mechanism for income redistribution, disproportionately benefits the affluent at the expense of the marginalized. The elderly, disorganized, and poor endure this redistribution while those with greater control over their incomes reap the rewards. Consequently, income flows from older people to middle-aged individuals and from the poor to the wealthy, perpetuating the dominance of the power elite and fostering subservience to statism among Americans.
For more about this societal manipulation, see how the now familiar “consensus-building process” uses the Hegelian dialectic of collective thought based on a thesis, antithesis, and synthesis:
Reflection
Based on the “realities” of today, it is easy to reflect on the idea that people of all worldviews are unwitting pawns. Few know they are captive under a Hegelian dialectic power play. Considering how most people rolled over during the COVID-19 power play, it is a provocative notion that warrants consideration. In applying this concept to power dynamics, one could argue that various ideologies, institutions, and individuals engage in a perpetual struggle for dominance, each representing a thesis or antithesis in the ongoing dialectic. From political ideologies to religious beliefs, economic systems to cultural movements, these forces clash and evolve, shaping the trajectory of society.
At first glance, it might seem that individuals espousing different worldviews know their roles within this dialectic. After all, political movements often actively seek to promote their agenda and gain influence, while religious institutions articulate their beliefs and seek adherents. However, upon deeper reflection, one can discern subtler dynamics at play.
Individuals within these movements may not fully grasp the broader dialectical framework in which they operate. They may passionately advocate for their beliefs without realizing how they fit into the larger historical narrative of conflict and resolution. This lack of awareness can lead them to perpetuate cycles of division and struggle unwittingly.
However, those in positions of power within these movements may manipulate the dialectic for their ends, exploiting the passions and convictions of their followers to consolidate their influence. Whether in politics, religion, or other spheres, leaders often frame their actions as part of a grand narrative of progress or salvation, obscuring their true motives and perpetuating a cycle of manipulation and control.
Furthermore, the complexity of the dialectical process itself can obscure the true nature of power dynamics. As conflicts arise and resolutions rise, the lines between oppressor and oppressed, victor and vanquished, can blur, creating a sense of ambiguity that serves the interests of those in power. This ambiguity can make it difficult for individuals to recognize their complicity in systems of domination and exploitation.
In light of these considerations, it becomes clear that the Hegelian dialectic can serve as a lens to understand the dynamics of power in society. By recognizing how individuals and institutions participate in this dialectical process, we can strive for a deeper understanding of the forces shaping our world and work towards a more equitable and just society. However, this requires a willingness to examine our beliefs and actions critically and confront the uncomfortable truths about power and privilege at the dialectic’s heart.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s legacy reverberates through the corridors of philosophy, politics, and societal dynamics. His pioneering concept of dialectical thinking continues to shape our understanding of reality, history, and human progress. Hegel’s influence extends beyond academia, intersecting with the elite’s intricate web of power and control.
Contrary to the ethos of individual rights championed in the United States, Hegelian principles steered Germany towards a paradigm of “rational tyranny,” where the state assumed divine-like authority over its citizens. This dialectical process, orchestrated by the power elite, perpetuates a cycle of manipulation and control, shaping policy decisions and societal narratives.
The Hegelian dialectical method, with its three-stage thesis, antithesis, and synthesis process, serves as a blueprint for managing conflict and consolidating power. As tensions and divisions deepen, the power elite emerges as the ultimate arbiter, offering solutions that perpetuate their dominance while masquerading as the people’s will.
Through economic manipulation and covert tactics, the power elite ensnare citizens in a web of debt and dependency, fostering subservience to statism and perpetuating inequality despite warnings from visionaries like Thomas Jefferson. Americans face a cycle of fiscal encroachment and diminishing liberties, with the burden of debt weighing heavily on future generations.
In the face of these challenges, understanding Hegel’s philosophy and its intersection with political power dynamics is crucial. By shining a light on the hidden mechanisms of manipulation and control, we can strive towards a more informed and vigilant society committed to safeguarding individual liberties and resisting the encroachment of tyranny. Hegel’s not-so-enduring legacy serves as a reminder of the perpetual struggle for freedom and enlightenment in the face of hegemonic power.
Parting Shot
Recall this text from above: “Clinton projected a tough anti-drug stance as Commander in Chief.” Behold:
It is a sickening thought to realize these crummy charlatans (neo-right and uber-left) have power over us. Lastly, does any reader know why legacy media refuses to tag the pro-Hams protests at Marxist academia as part of any perceived or proclaimed “wing?” 📕
Sources
America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones ~ Anthony Sutton, 335 pages, Trine Day, April 2003
Cloning of the American Mind: Eradicating Morality through Education ~ B.K. Eakman, 600 pages, Huntingdon House Publishers, August 1998
Empower The People: Overthrow the Conspiracy That is Stealing Your Money and Freedom ~ Tony Brown, 371 pages, Quill William Morrow, 1998
Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World ~ Ted Flynn, 550 pages, Mazkol Communications, May 2000
Recommend Related Reading
Frederick R. Smith Essays
I warmly encourage you to consider becoming a paid subscriber if you have the means. Tips are appreciated, too. Regardless of your choice, your support is deeply appreciated. From the bottom of my heart, thank you for your invaluable support!
Invaders are not bound to these figures (by design).
Thank you for this fantastic article. Very valuable information!
The Hegelian Dialectic: that's a phrase I've always heard and never understood. Of course, we all know that every revolution sews the seeds of the counter-revolution and the yin/yang never stops. I appreciate your putting the link to CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND in this.
Just as NATO destroyed Yugoslavia and Libya in their practice drills, the CIA took over Ukraine in 2012 and, followed closely by NATO and EU and UN troops, the USSA wants to conquer the world before November.