The Birthing Person of Medical Mutilation Madness

Dr. John Money (1921-2006) was a psychologist, sexologist, and advocate for gender identity and sexual diversity. He believed that gender identity is primarily shaped by social and cultural factors.

Apr 09, 2023

...neither tolerance nor intolerance is grounded in science and reason, but they are themselves acts of faith grounded in social custom and the politics of expediency and power.
Dr. John Money

Foreword

I hold no animosity toward individuals who experience gender dysphoria. Moreover, as demonstrated here, those suffering from dysphoria are victims of a cruel crime against humanity. Also, there is no resentment towards anyone based on their sexual orientation or other characteristics. I firmly believe that violence against anyone, regardless of orientation, must be met with justice.

It is with hope this disclaimer will prevent any misunderstandings in interpreting this essay. Despite the genuine attempt to compassionately address a significant societal issue, there may still be accusations of promoting hate speech or inciting events. Nevertheless, I intend to foster understanding and dialogue, not encourage or condone violence or discrimination. The other side refuses to embrace anything associated with dialog despite their fiat claim of “diversity.”

As an adult, one may make life decisions as long as they do not harm others. If an adult identifies as the opposite gender, I may disagree. Yet, I will not get in the way of their freedom to think that way, as I would not intervene if someone consumes too much fast food. We all make mistakes in life, and in a cogent-thinking society, we accept the repercussions. But, it becomes irritating when “intentional blunders” such as trans warfare cause harm to others. The gender-bending war occurs through the indoctrination, manipulation, and castration of children.

Society has long-standing laws and statutes that prescribe 18 as adulthood. Some states may define a younger age for a driver’s license. Likewise, others may stipulate a later age to consume alcoholic beverages. The noisy minority and their handlers claim state laws limiting gender reassignment to adults are a strike against “human rights.” That is the supreme example of Orwellian propaganda.

Summary

Dr. John Money (1921-2006) was a psychologist and sexologist. He conducted research and floated theories on gender identity and sexual orientation. He was a professor at Johns Hopkins University. Money pioneered gender and sexual identity, advocating for gender reassignment surgeries. He birthed the idea that gender is a social construct. Despite his contributions, Money’s work was also controversial. He faced criticism for his methods and unethical behavior.

The gender-breaking work by Dr. John Money set the foundation for the warfare waged by the modern transhuman movement. It is beyond comprehension that today the highest level of our nation forms the backbone of a fuzzy-gender new normal. In particular, its spineless promotion of medical mutilation madness psychologically attacks the citizens.

Dr. John Money Biography

Dr. John Money was a psychologist, sexologist, and advocate for gender identity and “sexual diversity.” He was born in 1921 in New Zealand and died in 2006. He received his Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Otago in New Zealand. He later received a Master of Arts degree in Psychology from Harvard University.

Money began his career as a research assistant at the University of Otago and later worked as a lecturer at the University of Auckland. In 1955, he moved to the United States and joined the faculty at Johns Hopkins University, where he worked for over 40 years.

Dr. Money is best known for his research on gender identity and sexual development, particularly his work on “gender roles.” He believed social and cultural factors affect gender identity rather than biology. Money also wrote several books on gender and sexuality, including Man & Woman, Boy & Girl (1972), and Lovemaps (1986). He was a member of the American Psychological Association and the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality. He received several awards for his work, including the Lifetime Achievement Award from the World Association for Sexual Health in 2002. Some “achievement.”

The untarnished segment of the scientific community criticized Dr. Money’s work and views. They shuttered at his gender identity and sexual diversity claims. The criticism focuses on the lack of scientific rigor and ethical concerns. The primary concern is the harm caused to the individuals involved in his studies and experiments.

In 1955, Dr. John Money launched the modern transhuman movement. He started the contemporary and foolish notion that people are born gender-neutral. We supposedly face “separation from anatomy and chromosomes.” While Money describes the outward physical attributes of males and females, he claims people are born “gender neutral.” Thus, socialization determines a male or female persona. While baby Jane has two X chromosomes, she has the potential to feel like a man. Baby John, with male genitalia, gets dressed in pink, given dolls, estrogen, and “bottom surgery,” and will transition into JonAnn.

Dr. Money told us that for babies from two and a half to three years of age, gender is fluid based on environmental influence. After that, the feeling becomes fixed. Based on the changing thresholds of today, nothing has a settled position. Now we know why the upper strata can no longer tell us what constitutes a woman.

From a natural law perspective, John Money is a kindred spirit of Alfred Kinsey. They both believed sex between adults and children could be beneficial. Money was also a proponent of incest. He also despised traditional morality by arguing that ancient taboos were “destructive.” Kinsey and Money seem kindred in another way. John Money’s writings about childhood and abuse at the hands of his father manifest as gender issues.

Dr. Money had a juvenile-like infatuation with hermaphrodism, an extremely rare medical disorder. It is a condition where a baby is born with male and female reproductive organs. Dr. Money dedicated his life to proving that each person is “psychologically a hermaphrodite.” Far from a psychological condition, hermaphrodites suffer from a severe physical dilemma. Money’s Ph.D. “thesis,” completed in 1952, focused on this medical condition and its treatment. After that, he pioneered the work in “sex assignment,” focused on the complex decision to raise a hermaphrodite as male or female. Money established the country’s first clinic for hermaphrodite surgeries. That occurred at Johns Hopkins University. Later his clinic became the first in the United States to provide sex-change surgery for adults. That clinic also provided surgeries to transition other than hermaphrodites.

Dr. Money died in 2006 at the age of 85. His warped work continues with debates in psychology circles, gender studies, and sexual diversity.

The Bruce Reimer Tragedy

The most famous patient of Dr. Money was Bruce Reimer. Bruce (later David) Reimer, along with his twin brother Brian, was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, on August 22, 1965. At eight months, Bruce suffered a medical accident to his penis during a procedure to treat a condition known as phimosis (impossible to urinate).1 Afterward, his parents heard Dr. Money on television talking about gender reassignment. In desperation, Bruce’s parents sought out Dr. Money. The Reimer’s accepted Dr. Money’s “solution” to transform twenty-two-month-old Bruce into Brenda.

“Brenda” would be raised alongside his twin brother. It was the perfect test case for Money to prove that a neutered boy supplied with girl toys established gender identity. Thus began the pseudo-science that male or female is a learned trait, not inborn. It is all post-modern natural law-busting theory accepted as “dogma.” Parents worldwide facing similar circumstances were advised to castrate their sons and raise them as girls. The media industry pushed this procedure to address trauma or a medical condition.

Dr. Money had not seen or heard from the twins for about twenty years. Still, in 1996 he republished Man & Woman, Boy & Girl. In that updated work, he described the experiment as a complete success. Much to the chagrin of Dr. Money, a year later, “Brenda” came forward and revealed that “she” was now David. The public learned everything was a hoax.

From the beginning, Bruce had fought against the reassignment through plastic surgery to make a complete “Brenda.” This victim of circumstance refused to play with dolls. He preferred wrestling and urinated, standing up whenever possible. Peers teased Brenda for the boyish speaking and gesturing. Bruce/Brenda endured years of agony. The “therapy” by Dr. Money for the twins was nothing short of criminal. Money told the children to remove their clothes during their yearly visits. He had them look at each other’s genitalia and act out sexual intercourse. Dr. Money aimed to convince Brenda to undergo surgery to construct the facsimile of female genitalia.

It was years of nightmares for the boys and their parents. Despite Money’s warning never to do so, Brenda’s parents disclosed the truth. The revelation occurred when “Brenda” was 14, and he expressed relief to know the reason behind his behavior.

Dr. Money ignored the news. The façade ended, but the misery continued. Despite his challenges, Brenda decided to live as his true self. He underwent further surgery to construct a penis and changed his name to David. He married a woman named Jane, and they adopted three children. He also became an advocate. He spoke about his experiences to raise awareness and help others who were going through similar struggles.

In a sad turn of events, David Reimer took his own life in 2004 at 38. His twin brother later also perished from the same fate. David’s case and his life have had a profound adverse impact on psychology and sexuality studies. It has blossomed at warp speed recently, as demonstrated by the growing bizarre understanding of gender and identity.

Analysis

The case of David Reimer became known in psychology and sexuality studies. Untarnished experts use the case as an example of the dangers and limitations of gender reassignment surgery. The rest ignore it. The case of David Reimer highlights how messing with nature results in an unnecessarily complex “understanding” of gender and identity. It also illustrates the risk of claiming that gender for all is not a binary construct but a spectrum.

We see the flaws in Dr. Money’s theory that gender identity is only a product of socialization, changeable through surgery and therapy. Many accepted Dr. Money’s thesis at the time, and he used the case of David Reimer as evidence of the success of his theories. Professionals not absorbed into the woke ecosystem discredit Money’s theories.

Despite these facts, many of today’s sex “educators” remain loyal to the Dr. Money trail. Starting with austere and rare instances in 1955, the transformer money trail launched into orbit in recent years. The Libs of Lazy Legacy Media ignore entirely the plight of unfortunate victims who want to undo the Frankenstein-like sex change procedures done to their bodies. Meanwhile, the same machine dilutes people with mutilation memes. Of course, it is not in the money stream’s business interest to expose the nefarious influencing experienced by Bruce/Brenda/David.

Indeed, gender confusion goes back to ancient times and is considered unusual. But we can thank Dr. Money for his “groundbreaking” (what a laugh) work setting the stage for today’s sexual confusion craze. In past decades, we heard about toxic masculinity and how men cause problems worldwide. Yet schools now supply “chest binders” to help girls transition into boys. Wrap your head around that delusion. Secret dressing rooms are the craze in some school districts. That enables John to transform into JonAnn (or vice versa) without Mom and Dad knowing. And it gets worse with anal sex as part of lesson plan discussions for grade school students.2

The covert and overt pervert program of today laboring to transition school children is nothing short of government-sanctioned child castration. It is all part of the population reduction program for apparent reasons. Like it or not, it is abuse, and to speak out at a school board meeting could trigger a directive to have the FBI squad visit your home. Meanwhile, promoting vile pedophilia hidden in plain sight (i.e., toddlers in attendance) via drag queen shows goes unabated. To add insult to injury, the American Academy of Pediatrics supports “sex changes” for children.

As the putrid progressive leftists continue Dr. Money’s trial ballooning through radical LGBT ideology, “gender dysphoria” has exploded in the U.S. among youth ages 6-17. Between 2017 and 2021 alone, a Reuters investigation found that at least 121,882 minors were diagnosed with gender dysphoria (being mentally distressed due to a perceived mismatch between one’s gender identity and biological sex). Regarding the terrible trans future, this paragraph by Michael Lind from The Tablet, January 30, 2023, edition, The Power-Mad Utopians, is spot on:

The Androgyny Project, for its part, is bound to crash against reality in the form of human biology. I predict that in a generation the “progressive” policy of so-called “gender-affirming health care” will be viewed in hindsight the way the prescription of lobotomies and chemical castration as cures for homosexuality in the 1950s is viewed today.

Meanwhile, an official with the National Education Association (NEA), America’s most prominent “teachers” union, said kids should start learning about “gender identity” and “preferred pronouns” in pre-kindergarten. “When you look at elementary school students, many people think they are too young to talk about pronouns,” said the NEA’s Matthew Powell during a webinar in 2022. But “by asking students their [preferred] pronouns at a young age,” operatives “can make room for students who may be exploring gender identity….” Click here for more.

The medical field is not telling the entire truth. At this point, a person cannot be transgendered without resulting in complications for life. Maybe in decades to come, it might be available. Even if such a “perfect” dystopian procedure becomes a reality, a child should not be coerced into such a life-changing event. More importantly, it is simply abuse to have children make a decision that results in health problems for life and not understand the ramifications. Furthermore, the result is unnatural, and “bottom surgery” emperils the physical pleasure of sex acts.

It is important to note how political groups and nefarious influencers frame the narrative. In this case, collectivists accuse cogent folk of banning books without mentioning that the books are about corrupting and disfiguring young people. This justification is a totalitarian tool to support banning newsfeeds and reporters from delivering opposing viewpoints. Of course, the mob clamoring about book banning is the same squad that cancels great works such as Shakespeare with impunity.

The explosion of the gender affirmation alt-reality is a population reduction instrument. Few realize it is a medical-psychological operation that benefits the elitist of society. The “customer” suffers the pain of cellular changing substances and body-mangling surgeries. It is a puzzle palace as health care dwindles for most people, but gender affirmation “care” gets top billing. It is frightening to witness an exponential number of medical resources going to this sexual confusion program. The “choice” mob is anti-choice in this grand experiment. They cancel any effort to help the poor victims of this cruel experiment return to their birthright.

Reflection

Get ready, sports fans, for some news from Canada. The resulting stench is headed to a town near you in the USSA: High school student suspended, arrested for saying only two genders. That massive mound of manure shows us how the John Money legacy continues at warp nine.

The gender-bender folk will not be happy until heterosexuality is made illegal. I’m not joking. Take a trip to Provincetown, Massachusetts, and wear a jacket with the embroidered words “Natual & Healthy - Heterosexuality.” Walk down the main street and see what happens. You will face hate crime charges, squelched free speech, and spontaneous pushy progressive mob protests. Meanwhile, ANTIFA salivates at any opportunity to cooper-up these pushy progressive mobs and guard the entrance to grotesque drag shows performed for toddlers.

But wait, there is more. YouTube Kids, a restricted mode that parents can enable to filter out inappropriate content, allows kids four or younger to access videos containing perverted pro-transgender content. At least 120 of these videos can be found. Young children can search for such videos, and YouTube Kids even recommends these videos. A few examples of these videos are:

Gender Explained for Kids
What Is Transitioning?
Kids Explain Pronouns
Kids Meet A Gender-Non-Confirming Person
Meet a Queer Kid
History of the Rainbow Flag for Kids
History of Pride Day
The Meaning of Pride

All thanks to John Money and his witting and unwitting followers. Today it is a form of malignant psychosis running through the mind of the masses, much to the delight of the Malthusian population reduction masters. Jennifer Bilek breathtakingly explains who and what is driving the trans agenda today.

Conclusion

The David Reimer and Dr. John Money gender reassignment saga preview today’s insane world. It highlights the dangers and limitations of gender reassignment surgery. It also illustrates the importance of understanding the man-made complexities of gender and identity.

David Reimer faced controversy, tragedy, determination, and advocacy. His legacy will be the awareness and confusion he brought to the otherwise simple reality of man and woman. Today, the transsexual ecosystem is a Pavlovian cult driven by the money of psychopaths.

Money’s gender gyrations germinated the seed that has blossomed into the heterophobic ecosystem of today. As Jennifer Bilek explains in her above video and her essay Who Are the Rich, White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology? the poor people suffering from this madness are guinea pigs of the medical-pharmaceutical complex. To learn much more, I also highly recommend reading the free online book Exposing the Gender Lie by Jeff Myers, Ph.D., and Branon Showalter.

Afterword

This mind-numbing issue deserves much more attention. Nevertheless, the one thing that terrifies me is the fact that the highest level of government finds promoting the castration of children to be a noble thing. The influencers promoting this psychological and biological warfare engage in mental masturbation. The victims are the people programmed to hate their God-given bodies and despise heterosexuals. They need our prayers, whereas the enablers will account for their deeds with the good Lord.

Our “healthcare” system is broken, yet the medical mutilation madness conglomerate directs resources to transform the gender of people. It is insulting and infuriating that my tax money and insurance premiums go to Frankenstein-like pogroms.

Bonus

This will make your day: a nifty misogynistic U.S. Navy instructional video, How to Succeed with Brunettes. 📕

Sources

David Reimer and John Money Gender Reassignment Controversy: The John/Joan Case ~ The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (asu.edu)
You’re Teaching My Child What?: A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Ed and How They Harm Your Child ~ Marium Grossman M.D. ~ 256 pages ~ Regnery Publishing ~ August 2009
Dr. Money And The Boy With No Penis ~ BBC Video