Deliberate Destruction of the Church

This essay is painful but out of love of the real suppressed institution; a disinfectant to purge out the bad

There is a species of moral, legal, and social modernism which we condemn, no less decidedly than we condemn theological modernism.
Pope Pius XI

Foreword

This post is painful but out of love for the Catholic Church. It serves as a disinfectant to purge the radical homosexual nexus. Like our nation, I desire not to leave but to resist and expose the other type of problem (collectivism).

Those who practice the proclivity discussed in this essay now have special protection with hate (thought) crime protection. Such individuals enjoy the Supreme Court and the Federal government's enshrinement of same-gender (and other) marriage. I harbor no ill will toward those who mind their business and live under that arrangement.¹ The concerns center on the radicals and extremists working to undermine natural law. Moreover, the radicals in the Chuch form a vile clique of individuals.

Introduction

The following essay, written in June 2004, provides an overview of the then-emerging Church scandal. This cancer continues, thus compelling me to revise and update the text. Enhancement to the original manuscript includes new hyperlinks and videos. Please see the information under the Postscript section and footnotes for additional information.

Caution: explicit language. 

The External Enemy

In 2002, the mainstream hyper-reported the Church sex scandal. The legacy media likes to call it pedophilia or, more recently, an “abuse” problem. However, many of the incidents did not fit the pedophile threshold. A number were consensual (and non-consensual) with older teens (pederasty) and young adults. The facts alone show this is a radical homosexual problem.

Anyone forcing sex at any age, regardless of the gender mix, is criminal. Of course, even when “consensual” adults engaged in this activity with underage boys and girls commit statutory rape. Furthermore, these priests (in name only) break their vow of chastity against their agreed oaths. That is also true for those priests engaging in consensual sex.²

There have been and continue to be many articles, broadcast news reports, and books written about the Church scandal. Yet, many use this scandal as an instrument to further their hatred of the Catholic Church. Even “religious” people use the scandal to promote an agenda. For example, some fundamentalists tout the mantra that the “Catholic Church is the Whore of Babalon.” Still, the writing of this post is a painful matter as the desire is not to attack the real Church. Exposing evil will set the ground for restoration. As disclosure and personal background, I am a practicing Traditional Catholic.³

The duplicity of the news media about the Church is without parallel. For example, there is the case of the Washington, DC, area priest who faced an accusation of molesting a young man many years ago. The victim (now an adult) recently shot the priest with a handgun. In this case, the handgun user was “a hero.” The jury found the gun user not guilty of assault against the priest, and he faced conviction of a minor gun charge. As he walked out the court door, the news showed many people cheering this person. Too bad that the media does not show the many thousands of people who use guns to save themselves or thwart a crime. Usually, the media portrays people who use guns as psychopaths. In this case, the media portrayed this gun user as a hero because he shot a priest.

Meanwhile, the mainstream avoided the North American Man-Boy Love Association. The American Civil Liberties Union defends this association’s right to free speech as a matter of information.

The Internal Enemy

The “Lavender Mafia” describes the diabolical coterie of individuals in the Catholic Church. They have accomplished their mission well. Their job: the deliberate destruction of Catholicism. That is not new, as it goes back to the 1920s. That scandal plagued the Church for the past 30 years and broke open at the turn of the century.

The most significant “walls” that must come down to eradicate this sinister cancer include the following:

• The priests and hierarchy deny that such cancer has spread from the organization’s lowest to the highest levels.

• Rejection by the laypeople that such a problem could occur in “their” Church. I witnessed the parishioners in a church applaud a pastor after getting booted for viewing homosexual pornography in the rectory. This applause occurred during the announcements at a New Order Mass.

• Fear of the good people that exposure of the real problem would destroy the Church (henceforth the cover-ups).

• The evil has made it seem that those who have tried to expose the problem are evil (I have personal knowledge of one case).

• The epitaph “right-wing radical, traditional Catholic” is used to discredit those trying to expose this evil.

Many books promoted by the legacy media discuss the “pedophilia problem.” The vast majority of these books are nothing but destructive instruments. There are two books ignored by the legacy media that go right to the core of the problem in an attempt to expose this cancer and restore the Church:

• Amchurch Comes Out: The U.S. Bishops, Pedophile Scandals and the Homosexual Agenda by the editor of The Wanderer (an orthodox Catholic newspaper), Paul Likoudis. He worked for 15 years researching, recording, and writing about sexual libertinism and “queer theology.” He details how “queer theology” taught in Catholic colleges and seminaries “deconstructs” heterosexuality. The book describes the crimes and sinister deeds.

• Goodbye, Good Men: How Liberals Brought Corruption into the Catholic Church by Michael S. Rose shows that “queer” seminaries are common throughout the nation. Gay priests and liberal nuns recruit gay men and others of questionable moral character while turning away heterosexual orthodox men. This book tells the whole shocking story about the “Pink Palaces.” Rose introduces you to a lesbian witch who attended classes with Catholic seminarians. It also details the scolding of a seminarian for owning a traditional garment called a cassock. It shows that seminary administrators took no action for the gay sexual harassment of non-gay seminarians.

I do not accuse all homosexual people of committing hostile acts. For example, same-sex copulation (sodomy) between adults is legal between consenting adults.⁴ Nevertheless, such acts are a sin.

Certain members of the Church hierarchy have protected this corrupt network. So, this “system,” often called the “Lavinder Mafia,” has hidden pedophiles and pederasts. More shocking are the reports of the abuse of adults (seminarians) under select Church “leaders.” To a smaller extent, sexual misbehavior has even affected heterosexual priests. For example, reports of clerics engaging in sexual conduct with women. Allowing married priests is not the answer, as explained by Rose in his book Goodbye Good Men:

By 1970 Coulsoncame to the realization that the human potentials movement, and especially the encounter groups, were destroying long-standing institutions in the Church—seminaries, convents, and the like.⁵ He was distressed by the number of priests and nuns who were losing their faith, dispensing with sexual mores, and abandoning their vocations after being introduced to the theories of humanistic psychology. Thus, in Coulson’s informed opinion, it is not celibacy that drives priests and religious to pedophilia and other sexual perversions, but “bad philosophy,” a philosophy that dispensed with chastity. Celibacy was a casualty, not a cause.

This point is highly relevant to the controversy surrounding the male, celibate priesthood. But unfortunately it is too often overlooked or dismissed in order to keep the focus on celibacy as the culprit. Indeed, most proponents of dispensing with clerical celibacy fail to see certain essential points that do not support their cause.

It is neither celibacy nor the Church’s teaching on human sexuality that leads to sexual scandal among priests. Rather, it is loss of faith and lack of a prayer life. What is the source of this loss of faith or lack of prayer life that leads to sexual aberration? Those who contend that celibacy is the cause of all the ills in the priesthood do not often consider the actions of bishops and others in positions of authority in Catholic dioceses that potentially lead to destructive behaviors among their priests.

Certain Dioceses, such as Boston, have had many questionable priests. It is also important to note that several priests faced accusations under fabricated pretenses. For example, there is the case of one priest who hugged a child after the funeral of that child’s parent. An act acceptable under regular times resulted in charges against the priest.

What was the watershed event that got the ball rolling? In 1948, Dr. Alfred Kinsey’s “children as sexual from birth” poison was inserted into the nation’s psyche. His claims were out of phase of the national consensus about children. As a result, incidents between children and adults faced “therapy.” By 1990 about 80 percent of convicted child molesters went free (with therapy).

Another pretense planted on the citizenry by Kinsey was that claim “ten percent of the human population is lesbian and gay.” Yet, this figure is as low as two percent, depending on the source.⁶ Much of Kinsey’s “statistics” came from the sex lives of convicts in prisons. To claim that such statistics are representative of the population is a lie. Yet, the number of people with this penchant is increasing as it is now fashionable to “come out.” Watch sitcoms for a while to see the brainwashing machine in action.

While homosexual priests should be less than the general population, reports show it is between 30 and 60 percent. This figure is much higher than the general population. Coupled with the Church’s official teachings against homosexuality, a covert operation is in place. Its mission: make the church collapse.

Pornography under the guise of “sex education” has entered into many Catholic institutions. Proper reproduction education for high school students can be a wholesome experience. Yet, the debauchery promoters have ther hook. Many young seminarians attended “Sexual Attitude Restructuring” programs. This despicable program began at the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco (IASHS). The dean of this program was none other than Wardell Pomeroy (Kinsey co-author). In the mid to late ’70s, this institute published Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality. Much of it is pornographic. That includes photographs of the faculty, staff, and students engaged in orgies, including child pornography. IASHS claims they have “trained” over 100,000 “experts,” and many serve religious institutions. Films of masturbation, as well as heterosexual and homosexual sex acts, are considered “formation.”

A National Institutes of Health awarded a 1.24 million dollar grant to Dr. William Crano of the University of Arizona. That program conducted an unmonitored three-year AIDS survey on 2,453 elementary school children in Tucson Diocese. It was nothing more than a sex experiment under the guise of an AIDS education program. In a nutshell, this program molded children into homosexuality. That amounted to an assault on Catholic children as unwitting subjects for eighth-graders. They were learning sessions about anal sex and bestiality in their Catholic classrooms. So much for the “separation of church and state.”

Within the Church itself, since the ’60s (post-Second Vatican Council), we see the downside of the fundamental mysteries of the faith. Thus began the 30 years of a sixty percent decline in Mass attendance. Also, many new textbooks, methods, programs, and approaches replaced the traditional Catechism. The Religious communities underwent a “renewal.” Catholic colleges, many of which are Jesuit, have become ultra-liberal secular institutions.⁷ New Age thinking, such as the radical psychological teachings of Carl Jung, eastern meditations, etc., have been used in Catholic religious teaching and therapy sessions.

Continued Disbelief and Denial

One well-known priest known for his insightful teachings wrote that Rose’s book is “lopsided.” In translation, it’s unacceptable to be a true conservative (or classical/traditional liberal). Rarely do we hear priests talk about this issue, and few touch on the core issue. Until the good laypeople, clerics, and the Church hierarchy understand the sinister nature of this problem; it will not go away. There is shocking information in the book Amchurch. Here are a few salient samples:

• A parish in upstate New York may have had priests engaged in satanic rituals. Several children who faced these rituals died in “automobile accidents” of mysterious circumstances.

• The murder of a good Wisconsin priest who had contacted an investigator looking into a homosexual - pedophilia problem.

• The Church administrators excommunicated good laypeople in Hawaii for attempting to expose corruption.

• A priest used bottles to save the body fluids from his victims.

Besides the “sexual issues,” it is clear that this cancer affects many other elements of the Church. For example, an incident where a member of the Virginia state legislature kneeled to receive Holy Communion. Despite kneeling to receive Communion at other churches, the priest denied the Blessed Sacrament to this person. After Mass, the priest went out of the way to verbally attack this man. How shameful. So kneeling, a solemn gesture, is not permitted? Your Author heard the “leader” of our local New Order Church say that the “accepted norm in this dioceses” is to stand. How sad, indeed.

Priests claim that we need to build up and not tear down. While this may be true, the continued silence about the whole truth and the real reasons behind this problem must not find its way under the rug. That is what will continue to tear down the Church.

It is important to note how the media will not discuss the core problem. Why? The legacy media is the sodomy lobby’s primary instrument. The press will not report the wrong side of something they like. Day in and day out, homosexual “rights” in the guise of inclusiveness and multiculturalism get shoved down our throats. Will pedophilia be the next “right?”⁸

The Church scandal is just like the rest of the country, and departing is not viable. We must fight back from within to peacefully return our nation and churches (Protestant and Catholic) to their original good precepts.

The bottom line: evil has grafted itself into these otherwise fine institutions.

Afterword

A lot has occurred since 2004. Frederick R Smith Speaks The Deep Black Underworld provides more information about the church scandal under that post’s analysis section. Additionally, Your Author has acquired the five-volume series The Rite of Sodomy - Homosexuality in the Roman Catholic Church. In a stunning 2,568 pages, Randy Engles fully reveals how the smoke of Satan has infiltrated the Church and society in general. Behold a few salient book review points:

There was a time when ignorance of vice and sexual perversion, including homosexuality and pederasty, was a virtue. But today, civilized men and women are faced with the institutionalization and politicization of sexually deviant behaviors in contemporary society and the Church, need to be fully aware of the nature of the struggle in order to drive the sexual outlaws back underground.

An “open secret” is a secret hidden in plain sight. The homosexual lives of William Cardinal O’Connell of Boston and Francis Cardinal Spellman of New York and John Cardinal Wright, Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, were just such a secret and remained so even after their deaths. There are at least two reasons for this. One, because they lived in an era when most Americans were clueless regarding homosexual behavior in the life of any individual, much less in the lives of three Catholic prelates of so great a stature. Secondly, because, with few exceptions, O’Connell, Spellman, and Wright were surrounded by individuals who had no wish to know. The media and the police, for their part, kept their silence. The only group that openly discussed their sexual exploits were their homosexual contemporaries, and they never “outed” any of the cardinals while they were alive.

Sadly, the homosexual legacy of Cardinals O’Connell, Spellman, and Wright has followed us into the 21st century. We are currently on the third generation of clerical homosexuals and pederasts who can be directly tied to these prominent prelates of the early 20th century... and there will be more generations to come unless the Vatican acts to disinherit the heirs of perversion from the Catholic priesthood and religious life.

There is more with the 2019 case of the defrocked Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. A March 21, 2019, article by Church Militant reported that McCarrick ran a homosexual sex ring of teenage boys from his beach house in Sea Girt, New Jersey. In that same article, McCarrick’s far-reaching corruption included geopolitics:

In addition to his sexual corruption, McCarrick’s name recently resurfaced for playing a key role in political corruption, apparently ceding control of the Vatican to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). According to experts, the CCP has been sending $2 billion annually to the Holy See since Pope Francis took office in 2013 as part of a plan for world domination. The strategy is to bribe and control Italy through the Vatican and the European Union through Italy.

McCarrick has long been considered an architect of the Vatican’s relations with China, having visited China several times over the past decades ahead of the secretive Vatican-China agreement that Cdl. Joseph Zen, emeritus bishop of Hong Kong, has called a “total sellout” of the underground Church in China.

For those who wish to peel the onion further:

• Radio Maria with Steve Koob, Randy Engle interview

• Rosemary Fielding Book review, Rite of Sodomy

• CFN Interview with Randy Engel - “homosexuality and the New World Order”

• New Engel Publishing

Finally, today we live in an Orwellian world. To state the above facts can invoke hate crime charges.

---

1. In this post-modern madness, individuals who openly practice sodomy and contorted copulation with surgically fabricated parts are now part of a specially protected class of people. They have the guarantee of Federally mandated state-sponsored “marriage,” and heterosexuals face Hate Crime Horrors for writing such things as this essay. Good for them, but the resulting heterophobia nastily projected by fellow traveler heterosexuals, feminists, polygamists, homosexuals, bi-sexuals, non-binaries, trans-formers, etc., is a revolting reality. More recently, the “trans-former” movement went into hyper-mode with people facing the Caustic Cancel Pogrom for daring to make any remarks about natural law facts that counter this mutilation schema. Nevertheless, love your neighbor, no exceptions.

Non-collectivist people who live in the “alternative lifestyle,” a distinct minority, know this has gone too far. For example, Douglass Murray from across the pond, who lives that lifestyle, writes extensively about the madness of the collectivist’s confusion and throat shoving. His book, The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race, and Identity, is an excellent treatise worth reading. Murray is a Gentleman and intellectual, and he does not make his arrangement a pride thing. Of course, collectivists are nonplussed.

2. Throughout the Catholic Church, a priest may not marry. In the Eastern Rite Catholic Churches, a married priest must have received matrimony before being ordained. The Catholic Church considers the law of clerical celibacy to be not a doctrine but a discipline. Married priests are allowed in Eastern Rite Catholic Churches, and Anglican priests who convert to Catholicism can remain married after ordination. In most Orthodox traditions and some Eastern Catholic Churches, men who are already married may be ordained priests, but priests may not marry after ordination.

3. Your Author avoids Wikipedia like the plague. However, incredibly, an internet search finds this salient Wikipedia definition: “Traditionalist Catholicism is a Catholic religious movement characterized by a set of religious beliefs and practices comprising customs, traditions, liturgical forms, public and private, individual and collective devotions, and presentations of Catholic Church teachings that preceded the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). It is associated in particular with attachment to the 1570–1970 form of the Roman Rite Mass (the Tridentine Mass), which traditionalist Catholics call the Latin Mass, the Traditional Mass, the ancient Mass, the immemorial Latin Mass, the Mass of All Time, the Mass of the ages or the Mass of the Apostles, the Traditional Latin Mass, or the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.”

Unlike the above Wikipedia entry, the Internet contains scandalous “Traditional Catholic” definitions. Incredibly some of the more outrageous text comes from so-called “catholic” (sic) circles. The National “Catholic” Reporter shows its hatred of orthodoxy (tradition-phobic) with this text from November 5, 2019: “In short, many traditionalist communities are breeding grounds for white supremacy, and the host of evils that often accompany it: misogyny, antisemitism, homophobia, and abusive or manipulative uses of religion. One need only glance at popular far-right Catholics on Twitter to see the toxicity and prejudice that, in these circles, is not only tolerated but applauded.”

Leftist Catholics embrace heretical beliefs such as women priests, abortion, United Nations worship, saving the environment over souls, idol worship, collectivism, humanism, and heterophobia. So naturally, collectivist traveler allies such as the Southern Poverty Law Center engage in a battle of memes. Specifically, the injection of a mental virus (meme) into the body politic to program the masses into an altered reality that can falsely project Fred and friends to be a member of one of those “traditionalist communities [that] are breeding grounds for white supremacy.” And there is this insanity: America’s Largest Catholic College Now Promoting At Least Eight Different Genders.

Your Author knows New Order Roman Catholics that, other than liturgical preferences, we share the same orthodox creeds that do not comport to the venomous ecosystem that despises tradition. We get along just dandy despite the Vatican’s claim we are “divided.” Various Rites, such as the Byzantine Catholic Church and others, share a similar holistic orthodoxy as Roman traditionalists. Conclusion: the ostensibly broad-brush use of misogyny, antisemitism, and homophobia is an ignorant, insulting, and arrogant meme (mental virus) that is, in a word, tradition-phobic. The majority uber-left never did and will never admit that radicalism exists in their worldview (Church and elsewhere). They are the radicals. Bring back classical liberalism.

This essay explains why the (fake) church hierarchy despises Traditionalists and their push to cancel our customs and rituals. In the interest of openness and honesty, this particular type of evil has infiltrated, to a much lesser extent, some “Traditionalist” factions.

Let us not forget the Vatican gave away the Church to the CCP in China. There, the CCP selects its bishops, not the Vatican. The ultimate betrayal against the loyal Catholics (no separation of Church and state there).

4. See No. 1

5. 1970, Dr. William Coulson, director of the Research Council on Ethnopsychology in California.

6. A rapidly changing metric because of the brainwashing of the populace to make-believe unnatural acts, body mutilation, and transforming is customary and even celebrated. Society is essentially now heterophobic.

7. Today, openly homosexual, tradition-phobic, and heterophobic priest James Martin (SJ) has the support of (pope!) Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Fr. Martin went viral on Twitter Tuesday, January 25, 2022, as pro-life Catholics took him to task for suggesting in a Tweet that being pro-life today means being “white nationalist.” Revolting, just revolting.

8. Shocking example, video: Let’s be mature about pedophilia.